Talk:Helvetica

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Helvetica article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Typography Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Graphic design High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Helvetica Neue typeface weights.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

helvetica roman vs helvetiva 55 roman

Hi,

Is anyone can confirm either this two font type is same or different?

Tq. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.131.44.159 (talk) 03:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Antique Legacy

Hello,

Does anyone know a font called Antique Legacy by Optimo?

Those font is very similar to Helvetica. NIKO (talk) 15:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Text optical size"

This term needs explanation. "Optical size" is linked from the article (to Font#Optical size) but not the prefix "text". The target says "(regular)": is that what is intended? One or other article needs to be revised. @Thunderbird2013:, am I correct in identifying this as your introduction? It doesn't seem an unreasonable one but would need citing, please? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The names of optical sizes are, to my knowledge, not standardised.

For instance, Helvetica Now uses "Text", "Micro", and "Display". The page you mentioned (Font#Optical size) lists the optical sizes commonly used by Adobe, "Regular" is conventionally equivalent to "Text" and is usually unspecified (i.e., Garamond Premier Pro Regular is only called "Garamond Premier Pro"). I think that's why it is termed "(Regular)" on that page.

Going back to your point, I think perhaps Font#Optical size should be edited and include this information (that names of optical sizes are not standardised). Helvetica Now and Neue Haas Grotesk both explicitly use the "Text" label to call their "regular" optical sizes, so I don't think the information on this page is wrong. Thunderbird2013 (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

Should we remove "widely-used" because of undue weight and WP:NPOV. Other "widely used" fonts like Times New Roman. 103.246.79.6 (talk) 00:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]