Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFP)
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Daler Mehndi

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Section blanking about his legal issues. Karst (talk) 10:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    A Minecraft Movie

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption – this page had been temporality semi-protected before, but this did not solve the problem, and thus the non-constructive edits have since continued. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 12:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Uzun Hasan

    Reason: Extended confirmed protection. Certain user insists/edit warring on redundant information copied from another article. User warned. Beshogur (talk) 15:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2002

    Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pi Glilot bombing attempt

    Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Terrorist attacks against Israelis in the 2000s

    Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing of Droop quota, instant-runoff voting, single transferable vote, counting single transferable votes, and electoral quota by a series of IPs. IPs do not belong to a single range that could be excluded by a range block, but all appear to be the same person. IP often introduces mistakes, typos, unsourced content, confusing or unclear wording that breaks up the flow of the text, and external links into the body of the article (prohibited by MOS). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Republic of China (1912–1949)

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    William Hanson (author)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sometimes several times a day vandalism. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 21:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Rigathi Gachagua

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    HMAC

    Reason: Lots of destructive edits from many different IPs, and no (or almost no) constructive IP-edits during the last two years. So perhaps at least a year of semi-protection? David Göthberg (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ben Davis (journalist)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Coastal California

    Reason: This article has a long history of vandalism and disruptive/unconstructive editing. To prevent further instances of that occurring, I am requesting that indefinite semi-protection be applied to this article. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The Dark Knight Rises

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors, IP and not, are consistently reverting one another about the movie's success in the Reception section. Ornov Ganguly TALK 00:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Malli (2024 TV series)

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs edit warring promotional information despite warnings. Previously semi-protected. CNMall41 (talk) 01:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    [[1]]

    Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by disgruntled family members who do not like the fact that Neil remarried. User: Snowman304 (Neils nephew) and Jakezbrown (his Great nephew) repeatedly remove accurate, well-sourced information about Neils life and his widow. Despite multiple attempts to restore the correct information, the user continues to delete it. They are obsessed with this and constantly make false edits and will not allow others to edit it, He died on June 24, 2021 and they last edited it as recently as October 5, 2024. Neil and his nephew, Andy, aka "Snowman304" had a contentious relationship. Andy's son, Jakezbrown aka, "Jakezbrown" were mad that they did not get more of an inheritance. PLEASE consider blocking these "editors, Snowman304 and Jakezbrown" from constantly vandalizing Neils page and memory. PLEASE provide semi-protection to stop these users, unregistered or new users from editing the page. THANK YOU 174.176.149.36 (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Benjamin W. Szerlip

    Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 02:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    KENV-DT

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    KRNV-DT

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    User:Caulde/u

    Reason: This blocked editor is no longer an administrator; I don't see a reason for full protection. I would like to be able to fix the half-dozen Linter syntax errors on the page. Some level of protection below full is fine with me. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Michael Stein

    Unprotection: Article from draftspace is ready to be moved. Draft:Michael Stein passes WP:NAUTHOR but might not pass WP:NPROF. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Gaza genocide

    My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

    "She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

    1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

    Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[2] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

    2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[3][4][5].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[6]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[7] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[8] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[9]][[10]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Gaza genocide 2

    Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
    My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
    If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[11][12] and a form of Holocaust erasure[13], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[14][15][16][17]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Yahya Sinwar

    Change infobox location of death.

    Old: "| death_place = Rafah, Gaza Strip, Palestine"

    New: "| death_place = Rafah, Gaza Strip"

    This would reflect the convention for other similar pages for recently assassinated Hamas officials in the Gaza Strip, such as Ayman Nofal, Jamila Abdallah Taha al-Shanti, Marwan Issa etc. The status of Gaza Strip as part of the State of Palestine, or as part of the autonomous Palestinian Territories (with the State of Palestine not recognized by most Western or OECD countries), is contentious (it does have limited observer state status in the UN). See International recognition of the State of Palestine. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 17:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done already by someone else. I don't see "Palestine" appended to that line anymore. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Israel–Hamas war infobox

    Inform readers of the distinction between the dagger symbol and the cross symbol in the infobox.

    Under "Commanders and leaders" in the infobox Yahya Sinwar has a dagger next to his name, but others such as Marwan Issa have a cross next to their name. The distinction between these symbols is not immediately clear to someone reading the article, I feel that this should be explicitly noted on the page. The Elysian Vector Fields (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @TheElysianVectorFields: That isn't the article page, that's the infobox template. I changed the target for you above. It seems the dagger means "killed in action" (KIA) and the cross means "assassinated". I honestly don't know how I'd add a note to that effect. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure it out. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Yahya Sinwar 2

    Reinstate the Template:Palestinian leaders sidebar removed without reasoning or discussion. Articles of other deceased leaders retain the template (see Ismail_Haniyeh & Abdel_Aziz_al-Rantisi). 2A00:23CC:D202:A201:0:0:0:1410 (talk) 22:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. It seems it was removed inadvertently during a maintenance edit. I have restored it. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Yahya Sinwar

    Change :supected" to "suspected" in the segment: <<During his time in prison, Sinwar continued to coordinate the execution of Palestinians supected>> RomanKaiser (talk) 02:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=1251716665"