User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 73.48.244.135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 491 five times in the last 5 minutes (Edits ending with emoticons or !, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:4073:4e9e:1c9f::280a:4201 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- 103.87.193.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40d4:2001:784b:3401:56ff:fe9e:a375 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Adnankhan khan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - CapCut was changed by Adnankhan khan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862954 on 2024-10-08T06:03:51+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 06:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- 106.222.227.137 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 172 five times in the last 5 minutes (Section blanking, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 27.34.87.107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Biraj Bhatta: Vandalism two days after 24 block, same style as before the block. Nick Levine (talk) 05:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sigmawarrioralphabetaomega (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- LavignerBoisOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. Username implies it is an 'Official' account associated with Avril Lavigne, which just so happens to be the type of articles they are editing also. R0paire-wiki (talk) 01:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Haatekhori BD (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Haate Khori. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — Czello (music) 16:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- If we do that, since we usually go to full-protection for only a few days and MediaWiki does not currently allow us to layer full and semi-protections, the article would remain unprotected when the protection expires until we could reprotect it if necessary. Might 1RR be a better option? Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- 1RR would be a decent solution as this is a CTOPs article — Czello (music) 07:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done And logged at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- 1RR would be a decent solution as this is a CTOPs article — Czello (music) 07:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swamini Brahmaprajnananda Saraswati (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism in AFD. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last was a couple of days ago. I am really loathe to protect AfDs (although I have done it) since it could be seen as tipping the process toward one side or the other. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- List of programmes broadcast by Nicktoons (British and Irish TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP addresses has continued after a previous protection. SB678 (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated edits, mostly by unregistered users, changing his nationality from Russian to Ukrainian without any discussion. [1] [2] [3] [4]
That dispute itself is covered in the article and no serious scholar considers him Ukrainian in any meaningful way. --Երևանցի talk 08:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 10:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Rise rise up the moonlighy (talk · contribs) blocked by Alexf. Indef, and globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Doraemon: Nobita's Great Adventure into the Underworld (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 12:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive addition of unsourced content. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:3813:C301:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks (this is hardly the only article they've been doing this on, and they were blocked for this a couple of months ago as well. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism, likely related to the war. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Svito3 (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under CT/EE due to the current disruption involving Poland and Ukraine. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection - We have a series of IPs who're claiming SSR is still alive and being hidden by his management - a far cry from what was the case even last year but still not something supported by the sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Nthep. for one year. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I think it would be a good idea to protect this article so that users without an account cannot edit them, since for about a month there has been a user with an IP from Macedonia (the last one he used was 77.29.162.92) who is constantly being blocked because he keeps vandalizing football team articles (Málaga CF, Real Oviedo, Granada CF, Athletic Bilbao, FK Partizan, FK Voždovac, etc.) AlejandroR1990 (talk) 16:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 77.29.128.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and disruption Kaustubh42 (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement: WP:CT/AI. Multiple non-EC editors have edited a contentious topic area on this page. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not going with indef here because I doubt there will be this level of editing interest come April. Will log at CTOPS, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An editor is using multiple IP addresses to edit the page, falsely claiming that two episodes that were left unaired in the US aired. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Reason: High level of vandalism by sockpuppet. Jassu712 (talk) 19:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Reason: High level of vandalism bh sockpuppet IP Address and account. Jassu712 (talk) 19:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Izno. Two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protection: Reason: High level of IP vandalism by sockpuppet account and one user was blocked for edit war but he still using sockpuppet account and IP address. Jassu712 (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 103.132.8.24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment::it was due to the user who requested get blocked and he was the one who still using sockpuppet that's why i am requesting for protection
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing on a newly released popular film, mostly by IPs (specifically from the 103.38.17.0/24 range which has already been blocked once for this [likely connected to the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Symon Sadik). These edits disrupt the lead/ib despite Talk page consensus to the contrary. Gotitbro (talk) 20:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That range hasn't edited the article in at least a few days. Recent history shows few reverts if any. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring from Colorado IP range Special:Contributions/2601:283:4600:7050:0:0:0:0/64, blocked once last April. Disruption also from France IPs. Binksternet (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, both times this change has been reverted, the explanations have been unhelpful and somewhat bitey (i.e.,
remove unsourced text
when the text includes sources, andRv edit warring
when it's the second attempt to add the text). Protecting this article for a single editor making what appears to be good faith edits is not justified. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DrKay (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator DrKay. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Favored target of an LTA (Sevgilerde) using too wide of an IP range to block. All IP edits over the past 12 months have been disruptive. Sable232 (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP spam. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked blocked by Favonian. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @SNUGGUMS: Please don't use this kind of edit summary. It starts off confrontational and focuses on the other editor instead of the content. Overall, it's bitey and it's no wonder the other editor made the same edit again. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure what comes off as confrontational about pointing out inaccuracies or defiance of a hidden note that was meant to be followed. Nevertheless, this is far from the only IP who did such things, and leaving the page unprotected isn't helping matters. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS: Starting a summary with a word like "False" reads as an attempt to shut down any discussion. Combined with "you shouldn't have ignored" and "fabricated claims", the tone feels accusatory and confrontational. These types of edit summaries are more likely to escalate disagreements (which happened) than result in a civil discussion.
- By the way, I wonder whether adding a link to a talk page discussion might help with that inline comment.
- As to protecting the page, only one IP editor has edited the article in the last 16 days. One person making the same edit twice isn't sufficient justification to protect an article, especially in these circumstances. The protection policy discusses the general principles involved in its lead and first section. Daniel Quinlan (talk) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure what comes off as confrontational about pointing out inaccuracies or defiance of a hidden note that was meant to be followed. Nevertheless, this is far from the only IP who did such things, and leaving the page unprotected isn't helping matters. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: disruptive editing Skyerise (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: persistent vandalism; immediately resumed after unprotection 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinte semi-protection: Ipersistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi -protection: persistent disruptive editing in the past 3 weeks. pc not working. at least 25 previous protections. That's enough 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Mdelvins (talk · contribs) blocked by Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 22:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Reason: Persisent addition of an identical non-constructive trivia edit by multiple accounts: 60.227.221.174, Funify01, and Forggot112. Rift (talk) 23:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also warned the IP editor about edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism; Palm Desert IP added Tibetan characters 2603:8080:D03:89D4:59E0:F5C3:2AAF:E3E9 (talk) 23:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: WP:ARBPIA Isi96 (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And doesn't have much direct connection to recent events. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP users keeps replacing the high quality infobox image with low quality. [5] [6] Requires WP:SEMI protection. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: To allow a finished draft be moved to mainspace. UV is bugged, so I'm forced to put a different thing but I'm trying to have this unsalted. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Partially done. Create-unprotected, but until the article's in mainspace we can't do anything else. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. Partially done, see response by Daniel Case. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ongoing edit warring/content dispute. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive editing and edit-warring by several IPs and User:Epnesthede. I suppose the IPs are Epnesthede himself. They also refuse to discus the issue at the talk-page. Only blynd revert of the stable version. Jingiby (talk) 03:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article has not been edited since it was created 18 years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per WP:GSCASTE. Long term disruptive editing over his caste.[7][8] last 500 revisions. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – intense vandalism after last pp expired. Ca talk to me! 05:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: An event that has already passed, and mostly final infomation. Wikihelper910 (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Wikihelper910: This was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic designation (post-1992 politics of the United States) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change the death part to assassination, so then the article will be more specific to explain on that part Fredd the boy (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done but it really doesn't matter if somebody changes it back, because the entire section already calls it assassination, and even to the article that is already titled that way. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
8 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Meets the minimum criteria, and a random sampling of their creations doesn't raise any red flags. My only concern is their liberal use of quotations in reception sections, but I don't consider it an overly serious issue for this permission as the copyright reports come away otherwise clean; I've also started a discussion on their talk page about it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. While I may not have thousands of edits or article creations, my work is rooted in careful research and learning from experienced editors. My focus is on Iranian early modern, modern, and contemporary art and culture, especially highlighting the stories of Iranian women often overlooked in history. I ensure all my edits are supported by reliable, academic sources, and I have a track record of accurate contributions with very few reverts. I believe that having the Autopatrolled right would allow me to continue enhancing the articles related to Iran and Iranian art and culture. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, Hounaam (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting the Autopatrolled right, like any other editor, to help reduce the NPP work load. I have worked at AFC/NPP/AFD, and I've created good articles that would pass a deletion discussion if nominated. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I'm requesting access for updating articles and doing various small tweaks. Ty. — Sadko (words are wind) 00:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
i will use it to correct the citation before the punctuation, on many articles i known User.inu6 (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Would find this very useful for tedious/repetitive edits. Thanks! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been asked to create talk pages (linking to wikiprojects) for category pages which I have created. This would be easy with AWB (there are a lot of them). Perspicax (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I want to replace links to old photos with links to better photos Kent Wang (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
I would love to use this for category maintenance and WikiProject tagging across a wide spread of articles quickly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
AWB would be helpful for tasks like fixing simple citation template errors, which I've been doing off and on since I made an account. I'd also like to continue leaning into other WikiGnome things (typos, ...). FifthFive (talk) 04:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I have been a registered user on Wikipedia for several years, with over 500 undeleted mainspace edits. I possess a strong understanding of content policies and guidelines, supported by my experience in quality control processes. I have actively participated in deletion processes like AfD, PROD, and CSD, contributed to Articles for Creation, and written new articles. I maintain a solid track record of interacting civilly and constructively with other editors, especially newcomers. I have no active behavioral blocks or 3RR violations within the last 6 months, and I am committed to reviewing pages solely on a volunteer basis. Imad_J (talk) 13:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request temporary NPR rights. After reviewing the criteria, I believe I meet the necessary requirements. Could you please confirm if I am eligible? Thank you! EEverest 8848 (talk) 04:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Greetings! I am requesting an extension of my NPP trial or have it made permanent. I was previously given a one-month extension to demonstrate my AfD skills, and in the one-month trial prior to that, I demonstrated my Review and AfC skills. Unfortunately, I have been busy preparing for the Chinese Chemistry Olympiads Finals and have had little time to edit Wikipedia for the past month. Still, I have performed some AfD and have hopefully shown my knowledge in that area. The Finals will be over on November 1st, and I'd have plenty of time to do editing then, which is why I am making this request. Pygos (talk) 07:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello. My 1 month NPP trial is set to expire in less than a week. I believe I have performed fairly well in working both redirects and articles. I've recently been working on initiating more AfDs. Requesting a review of my trial's expiration date for an extension or permanent status. Garsh (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights 79lives (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC) I just want to help review articles; I have tried going into WP:AFD and that has actually been really fun developing my knowledge on notability. But, going back on to the topic of being a New Page Reviewer would mean dedicating my time to try helping to alleviate he backlog and being able to sort out new articles whether they are an orphan or even need more citations.
I try to become more active, and I'm familiar with the guidelines as well. I need permission to expand my contribution on Wikipedia. Vikingsam (talk) 21:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
To review new pages on for the wikipedia main space-- Declining articles that don't represent our goals on this project. Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting trial for New Page Reviewer rights as I have made many significant edits to main pages on Wikipedia. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies and have experience in assessing the quality of new articles. With my background in content creation and editing, I believe I can contribute effectively to the review process and help maintain the quality of newly created pages. A trial would allow me to demonstrate my ability to effectively contribute to the review process and ensure that new pages meet the required standards. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I often move poorly-titled pages to more appropriate titles, usually to make them more WP:CONCISE, specific, neutral, or to correct spelling and transliterations. I also revert undiscussed moves in line with WP:RMUM. I would greatly appreciate having the ability to manage this myself. Skitash (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)
i have been on wikipedia for almost 10 years, I have familiarized myself with the projects mission. Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been using Wikipedia on-and-off since 2020, but I'm starting to become more active. I'd like to become a pending change reviewer, as I've often wanted to help out but have struggled finding where I can actually contribute, and I think this is a good place to contribute. I'm familiar with the guidelines, as well. Thx56 (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing since 2015, with almost 80K edits, and have experience patrolling recent changes such as those in my watchlist. I'm familiar with policies such as VANDAL and WARN, and regularly use appropriate edit summaries and warning templates, through the use of Twinkle and RedWarn. Having rollback rights would help me revert clear cases of vandalism more effectively. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I have been engaging in recent changes patrolling for some time now, so I'd like to request rollback permission primarily to be able to use tools, so that I can patrol more quickly and efficiently. Thanks. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I've been actively patrolling recent changes for a significant amount of time and have developed a solid understanding of Wikipedia’s guidelines on vandalism and disruptive edits. Throughout this period, I’ve consistently identified and reverted problematic edits, but doing this manually can be time-consuming. Having rollback rights would allow me to handle these issues more quickly and efficiently, helping ensure Wikipedia stays a reliable resource. I’m committed to using these tools responsibly and continuing to contribute effectively to the project. Thank you DelphiLore (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I regularly patrol the recent changes page using filters that flag edits that may have problems or could be vandalism. With confirmed vandals, I keep an eye on their contributions for a short time afterwards to catch any resumed vandalism, while continuing to patrol recent changes. I previously used RedWarn, but I currently use UltraViolet and Twinkle. Rollback would enhance my recent change patrolling and anti-vandalism efforts. Thank you. R0paire-wiki (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor[edit]
I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 134 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 16 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 2 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 618 |
Templates for deletion | 126 |
Categories for deletion | 141 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 54 |
All redirects for discussion | 411 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 16 |
Possible copyright violations | 21 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 245 |
All files proposed for deletion | 56 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 0 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 349 |
Unknown copyright status | 15 |
Unknown source | 15 |
No non-free use rationale | 3 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
Disputed non-free use images | 8 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,244 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 445 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,349 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,562 | 0.5 |
All articles needing rewrite | 5,963 | 0.09 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,315 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 39,241 | 0.57 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 11,021 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 528,484 | 7.67 |
All articles lacking sources | 82,255 | 1.19 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 667 | 0.06 |
All articles needing additional references | 465,747 | 6.76 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,613 | 0.07 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,714 | 1.53 |
All articles with dead external links | 311,384 | 4.52 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 144 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 16 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,573 | 0.02 |
All articles to be split | 804 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
Stub categories | 19,242 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 968 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 54,140 | 0.79 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,666 | 0.04 |
All articles with style issues | 19,451 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,756 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,599 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 354 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,654 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,782 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 5 |
All articles to be expanded | 66,240 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]Misc
[edit]Delete | Keep | Neutral | Oppose | Support | Note | Template |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |